Friday, January 14, 2005

Share Your Thoughts on C.O.B.E. (a proposed code of blogging ethics)

Thanks again to all of those who took the time to so thoughtfully respond to the questions I posed below via public comment and privately by e-mail. I grouped the sentiments that were shared and used them to propose a Code of Blogging Ethics.

Here is the code that emerged from the blogosphere:

A PROPOSED CODE OF BLOGGING ETHICS (C.O.B.E.)

1. Promote Free Expression by posting on your blog on a regular basis as well as visiting and posting on other sites in the blogosphere.

2. Avoid restricting access to your blog by certain individuals and groups and never remove posts or comments once they have been published.

3. Be as transparent as possible by revealing any personal affiliations that might effect the opinions you express on your blog.

4. Emphasize the “human” elements in blogging by revealing and maintaining as much of your identity as is deemed safe; promote equality by not restricting specific users or groups of users form your blog; minimize harm to others by never knowingly hurting or injuring someone with information you make available on your blog; and build community by linking your blog to others, maintaining a blogroll to encourage visitors to your blog to visit others, and by facilitating relationships between you and your readers.

5. Strive for factual truth and never intentionally deceive readers. Make yourself accountable for information you post online. Cite and link to all sources referenced in each blog post, and secure permission before linking to other blogs or web content.

6. Promote interactivity by posting regularly to your blog, honoring such etiquette and protocol policies that are posted on blogs you visit, and make an effort to be entertaining enough to inspire return visits to your site.

Though I welcome any and all commentary on the code, I would like to invite you to read the complete paper. Both the code and a link to a PDF of the paper are currently posted on the conference blog for the Blogging, Journalism, and Credibility conference being hosted by the Berkman Center for the Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, the Shorenstein Center on the Press, politics and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government, and the American Library Association's Office of Information Technology. If you would prefer, you may comment on the code via public posts on that blog.

The blogoshere contains many different types of blogs and is populated by many different types of bloggers. Any code that might serve to guide blogger behavior will necessarily continue to change and evolve. To that end, I consider COBE to be both a beginning and a continuation of an interactive discussion regarding the emerging relationship between freedom and responsibility in this new rhetorical space.

NOTE: Some commentators have noted that this code is very similar to the standards proposed by Rebecca Blood in 2002. It is. My results seem to indicate that Ms. Blood was accurately reading "values" that would be prized in a new medium. Her standards are presented at the end of the paper (with Ms. Blood's permission) as is A Bloggers' Code of Ethics by Jonathan Dube which is an adaptation of the SPJ Code of Ethics for use by journalistic bloggers.

8 Comments:

Blogger Andrew Watkins said...

Hey, Martin,

This is Andrew Watkins, saw your comment on Blogs of War about my DSS story, and let me return the compliment; this post is right on. Great idea, well put-together.

"in Derka-Derkastan", one of my links categories, has some great "boots on the ground" blogs, most recently found, and my new favorite, ArmorGeddon. An American Soldier, in my Military category, is getting shipped over any day now, if he hasn't already.

12:20 PM  
Blogger Malchus said...

Martin:

I applaud your efforts on the COBE, but have two issues with what's currently stated:

1. Your blanket insistence that comments, once made, should not be removed is both naive and dangerous. If someone chooses to provide a comment that could result in harm to others, including litigation, it is a responsible act to remove it. Forum moderators have known this for years, hence a comment from one of the leading forum owners at the most recent WebmasterWorld conference in Las Vegas - "don't go cheap on lawyers."
1-A. Would you also chose to not remove machine-generated comment spam?
2. Notably absent from your code of ethics is anything about bloggers in the workplace. Should the code guide employers' behavior as well as that of employee/bloggers. Recent actions at Google, among others, point up a need to address this facet of blog ethics.

Once again, glad that you are addressing this issue - and am doubly pleased that your efforts are originating from Chapel Hill, where I spent many wonderful years. Go Heels.

11:59 AM  
Blogger Malchus said...

Martin:

Not to spam you, but to offer another perspective re: the comment posted earlier today, please take a look at Bob Parson's rules:

http://www.bobparsons.com/BlogRules.html

Thanks

12:27 PM  
Blogger ciscoblog said...

The prevention of underage gambling and identifying and helping problem gamblers is a core objective in running an integrity driven online gambling operation. Gambling at blackjack, or any other Online Casinos Extreme game for that matter is a great form of leisure and entertainment, but for some it can potentially be dangerous.f

3:04 AM  
Blogger docsharp01 said...

Great blog with good advice, useful information and superb commentary! Online Penny Slots | Penny Slots Machines

1:53 PM  
Anonymous Online Casino said...

GamblingPlanet is the #1 Online Casino & Gambling Guide offering you the most reliable and best casino reviews with the

hottest bonus offers available.

11:40 PM  
Anonymous Free Poker said...

I like to visiting huge blogs on the internet. Your is just like i want to read so keep work here.
--------------

http://www.pokermaniac.eu
Continuation bet - that is, after the conquest of follow-play before the flop when checked, only one opponent. Here you have to play even without the card (eg AK preflop raise and table 772) because there is a chance of scooping the jackpot. However, if the opponent on the flop to make the turn without improving hand play (bet) will no longer incorrectly bluff, because usually weak opponent on the flop being careful and make the turn and river.
poker
Free Poker Bankrolls, no deposit online poker bonuses, free start poker.
Try to leave Bonuses for You.
It occurs: We collect for the straight (QJ of spades) at the table T92 (two penalty) and assume that your opponent has a high pair. The turn and river come two penalty but do not give us neither straight nor color but the enemy is waiting ... This is the situation on the bluff. If the opponent raised pre-flop, on the flop, the turn and the river, and we do not hit straight, and the table is not dangerous ... PAS! He will not fold our bluff.
This is http://www.pokermaniak.com.pl for Pol player.
Another situation in which weak players make horrible online poker mistakes ie.: Slow Play. Blinded by the mighty hand of the player or put too little or not at all by what she's missing a lot.
It gives the opponent a free poker card: Nothing worse there is no way to give BB (the player in the big blind position) to catch something strong after Limpia (ie, exercising in the pool and not raise) with AA, KK, or other good hand pre-flop. Just choose the wrong to give someone with a strong hand on the flop two pair or a straight.
texas holdem free

1:46 AM  
Anonymous Texas holdem poker said...

I love to play online poker and i search for texas holdem poker content now so i must leave this blog, but it looks like this blog is interesting anyway.
--------------
Pula is not built: In many cases, if we put the opponent dołożyłby as well as wait. If you then make the turn and the river, it would be a lot less than if Betuwe on the flop, turn and river. Assuming a beta of 2/3 pot on the river to win more chips then duuuuużo. These individual situations when waiting on the flop to give the opponent choose to strong (but weaker hand) do not compensate for lost Betuwe (and we have chosen a better hand and lose even more).
free money for start
Come dangerous card: sometimes having come straight third card in color, and although the enemy does not get the color (for example, two pairs) that can not be more win (because players are afraid of the color of the opponent), and this is another lost bets.
no deposit bonus
At low and mid stakes players do not observe the opponents or no regard for what they do. This means that you can confidently bet heavily strong systems and still is a good chance to test and win a big pot.
Texas holdem online
In the case of a failed bluff a player realizes that he made a mistake and after some time he will learn that there is so much play any of nothing. Just when you play Slow Play and will tighten to a better system. Unfortunately, unlike with Slow play is when a player wins the pot on the river average. He is satisfied with himself and enjoys a very well played. However, do not realize that he should have won a lot more if enough bet.
http://www.laptops-for-sale.org/
In conclusion, the low and mid stakes the simpler and more robust play good hands, without unnecessary bluffs and tricky plays, the better the results.
Soon our tenth episode of Poker Academy. (Former available HERE Enjoy!
http://www.tv-deals.biz for poker deals Tv.

1:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home